Comments on: Famous Atheist Antony Flew Changes Mind, Believes in God

By: shadfewl

shadfewl — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

Alright kids, let’s …
Alright kids, let’s be nice to people that change opinions about God. Its not nice to call him names when his IQ level is slightly double our own.

As for the comments about this or that, let’s just face it, you haven’t proven God doesn’t exist.

Your arguments are based on what you have observed and experienced, but that doesn’t discount the fact that God exists and you just have yet to observe Him.

Start your quest of knowledge from that thought.

By: gouki333

gouki333 — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

i agree, we all …
i agree, we all know that some of the proponents of I.D. are atheist , its all about which of the scientific evidence is more convincing. However, I.D. recognises that every design has a designer, then the next question is, which God was this designer might be? then next the question is, will you submit to that God or not? that is why some became a theist and others still an atheist. then he chose Christianity than the others. lets just respect him for that.

By: kazamslam

kazamslam — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

I’ve never …
I’ve never understood why Atheists and religious people can’t be civil with each other. Do we really have to debate over whether the universe was created by God or by random chance? Can’t we all just admire it’s infinite complexity? No one’s going to change anyone’s mind, and it doesn’t matter what others think, only what you yourself believe.

By: yoyo434

yoyo434 — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

Agree!!!
Agree!!!

By: wood9670

wood9670 — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

How is it that an …
How is it that an atheist can get away with denying the overwhelming scientific evidence for the Big Bang but when a Christian asks for an explanation for NATURALISTIC evolution they are immediately labeled as a fundamentalist anti-intellectual extremist.

Double Standard?

By: sarahGIGGLESx

sarahGIGGLESx — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

what is this battle …
what is this battle? Don’t say Rev 12:7

By: byussa

byussa — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

I love it how …
I love it how science and the scientific community has often claimed to erode spirituality. Now, that very science has verified the existence of an afterlife. The website DoesAccount explains.

By: sclock2

sclock2 — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

Would you rather …
Would you rather have suggested Islam or Hinduism? Wuts the big deal if he chose Christianity there’s nothing wrong with that. I thought you atheist hate all religions, I guess it’s just Christians you really hate. Wonder why… There’s another fulfilled Bible prophecy.

By: Pelonetillo

Pelonetillo — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

if everything in …
if everything in existence had to be created, who created the creator then? no one, right? well, based on your criteria, insisting that all in existence needs a creator, we can safely conclude that a creator not created does not exist because all in existence requires a creator. gg no re.

By: skyline300c

skyline300c — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:17:45 +0000

Some of you may be …
Some of you may be thinking that the beauty of nature etc does not prove that God exists, because science has been able to explain how this diversity and order came about.