16 Responses to “In Defense of “The End of Rational Atheism””

1. By johnnytardmanthe2nd on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   Exactly! Atheists …
   Exactly! Atheists are so amusing, arent they?

2. By HabitatBrainery on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   I can say YOU don’t …
   I can say YOU don’t exisit because I have never seen YOU but this does not make it a fact. How come this is easily agreed with but the minute one inserts GOD into the equation people want to argue.

   Don’t argue whether God exists or not, argue about whether you believe in Him or not.

   THIS VIDEO is GREAT! Keep up the good work!

3. By HabitatBrainery on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   “God cannot reveal …
   “God cannot reveal anything to us if we have not His spirit. ” -Oswald Chambers

   Simply Put, Don’t expect to understand with a human mind which can only be spiritually comprehended. I have more respect for people who believe God exists but refuse to have anything to do with Him, more than I have for those who say with ignorant audacity that He doesn’t exist. One would have to be “all knowing” to say anything does not exist.

4. By WashyBanjo on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   i did, your not …
   i did, your not really proving your beliefs at all. all your doing is proving agnostic beliefs. your videos can be easily applied to disprove your beliefs.

5. By h8uall66 on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   WashyBanjo in …
   WashyBanjo in precise in his conclusion that your argument can also be applied to gnostic theism. Notice that I did not say merely theism. Gnostic theism.

6. By AmI2Hvy4ya on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   Precisely? I’ll …
   Precisely? I’ll speak for myself.

   Watch, “The End of Rational Atheism.” I explain why theism is a rational worldview. Also, “An Examination of Agnosticism.”

7. By h8uall66 on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   He’s pretty much …
   He’s pretty much wrong about everything. I love how theists are so terrified of atheism that they can not even define it honestly.

8. By h8uall66 on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   Precisely.
   Precisely.

9. By virindi73 on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

   You got a good …
   You got a good voice! You should speak in your videos more often.

10. By jdf088 on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    the “a” means …
    the “a” means without in the word atheist “without god” so you are wrong in your definition, and wrong in your conclusion.

11. By TheFallibleFiend on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    No. You’re not …
    No. You’re not looking for any response. You’re not looking for “debate.” Your “logic” is just false assertion. It is safe to say that logic is a mystery to you.

12. By WashyBanjo on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    so your saying …
    so your saying gnostic atheism is irrational. so with your same argument you can say gnostic theism is irrational.

13. By AmI2Hvy4ya on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    Looking foward to a …
    Looking foward to a better response. Explain why my logic fails rather than rambling on about it.

14. By SirTheistDRF on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    Short, not too …
    Short, not too sweet for atheists. Sweet for theism.

15. By TheFallibleFiend on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    You’re not too …
    You’re not too heavy. Your video makes it clear that it’s a lot easier for some people to talk about logic than it is to actually practice it.

16. By k87jury on Mar 1, 2009 | Reply

    My response. watch? …
    My response. watch?v=zAsxR3eqNMU